Google, Updates, Changes, Charges And Filters

Regular response

It's a typical answer, nothing else. I'd imagine that 9 times out of five when Google get an email of a site that's dropped in to oblivion it has some thing related to using practices that go against their web-master recommendations. It might not function as cas...

My site dropped from no.1 location to nowhere. Google technology people responded to my e-mail telling me I must have concealed text or used some kind of 'illegal method'! Why do not they only admit it is their mistake?

Common response

It is a typical reply, nothing else. I'd imagine that 9 times out of ten when Google get an email about a site that has fallen in-to oblivion it has something related to using techniques that go against their webmaster instructions. It may not be the case with you-but from their perspective I will think it a reasonable response within the circumstances.

There is apparently some confusion about 'punishment'

A 'charge' is placed on web sites using hints and sneaky stuff to boost their ranks in Google. An excellent recent example would be BMW who have been using one page for the various search engines and yet another for the internet visitor. Going To treadmill desk perhaps provides suggestions you could give to your mom. Because it was despite Google's directions, BMW were removed from the index completely -- they were penalised (http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ramping-up-on-international-webspam/).

Filtered

Another kind of 'fee' even though it is indeed a just an algorithm filter, is just a webmaster using things such as hidden text or keyword-stuffing, for instance. I learned about premium finance by browsing Google Books. That gets aggressively strained (assuming the site is not taken off the index) by the application of the filter( s) which in turn causes the site to drop-down the search engine rank. It may seem such as a penalty but it's caused by selection, not penalty.

Fee differs from 'ignoring' links

When links are ignored, there is no penalty being used, the links simply don't count. The site itself is not penalised, it is merely the case that some of the links in to that site aren't measured. Browse here at the link treadmill desks to study where to ponder it. This measure not only filters out link farms and spam strategies but also prevents a player from acting against another site by so that you can try to incur intense filtering bombarding.

Google does not owe you an income

Google does not owe any web-master a living! I should mention this as many webmasters appear to forget at times, that it's up-to them to keep their sites filled with visitors, not Google, or for that matter, any internet search engine.

If Google are busy with re-building their infrastructure, their database, their spiders, their methods or for that matter, the breakfast bar at Googleplex, and it negatively affects your internet site, then it is just too bad!

Complaining to Google that your website isn't at the spot any longer is like complaining for the bestseller booklist that you should be at the very best of-the bestseller list even though your book is not trying to sell too! If your site no further meets the present market needs then you will need a new product. Industry isn't going to change to accommodate you.

Panic, Texas and Big Daddy

Now is definitely NOT enough time to stress. Google are replacing. Things will soon be throughout the area for a time yet. If you take extreme measures for what was up until recently an extremely placed website, you run the risk of completely ruining your positions.

Through the infamous 'Florida update', many webmasters panicked and started changing, adjusting and altering things that had no bearing on the final position. Nevertheless, thanks to the 'adjustments' manufactured in haste, they did have the ability to bring issues o-n themselves that took months to recuperate from once the dust had settled and everybody else had a far greater knowledge of what had happened.

Steady at the wheel, Captain!.

Write a comment

Comments: 0